<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: pfSniffer? A non-firewall use for pfSense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/pfsniffer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/pfsniffer/</link>
	<description>Networking, Programming, Operating Systems...  Anything I.T. related!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:44:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Cruft Of My Brain &#187; Cheap remote sniffer</title>
		<link>http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/pfsniffer/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cruft Of My Brain &#187; Cheap remote sniffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] comment      0Digg meLooking for a cheap and reliable way of doing packet capture remotely. I found this reference to using PFSense and it looks like a pretty slick idea. I was quite happy with PFSense when I was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comment      0Digg meLooking for a cheap and reliable way of doing packet capture remotely. I found this reference to using PFSense and it looks like a pretty slick idea. I was quite happy with PFSense when I was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfSense Digest &#187; Blog Archive &#187; pfSniffer? A non-firewall use for pfSense</title>
		<link>http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/pfsniffer/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>pfSense Digest &#187; Blog Archive &#187; pfSniffer? A non-firewall use for pfSense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] Jack of All IT posted an interesting use for pfSense, as a dedicated sniffer box. 1.3 allows the configuration of just one network interface, so uses like this will be even easier in the future.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jack of All IT posted an interesting use for pfSense, as a dedicated sniffer box. 1.3 allows the configuration of just one network interface, so uses like this will be even easier in the future.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeBSD News - quick links (week 17) &#124; FreeBSD - the unknown Giant</title>
		<link>http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/pfsniffer/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeBSD News - quick links (week 17) &#124; FreeBSD - the unknown Giant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackofallit.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] We recently had a need for this sort of thing and I had a great idea. Many months ago, I noticed that pfSense had added a very nifty feature called Packet Capture. Essentially, the pfSense WebGUI has an interface to tcpdump, allowing you to put in some simple filter criteria (source/destination IP Address) and have a trace executed on a particular interface. This is a really nice feature for troubleshooting your firewall, but I thought that this could be used to make a distributed “pfSniffer”. More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We recently had a need for this sort of thing and I had a great idea. Many months ago, I noticed that pfSense had added a very nifty feature called Packet Capture. Essentially, the pfSense WebGUI has an interface to tcpdump, allowing you to put in some simple filter criteria (source/destination IP Address) and have a trace executed on a particular interface. This is a really nice feature for troubleshooting your firewall, but I thought that this could be used to make a distributed “pfSniffer”. More&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
